Is Osho any good?

From the posting you've put up. Yes, because you are so stupid

"Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Z1jNa.87937$Pc5.21556@fed1read01...
> Do you really believe that I would believe in the mythical character,
> Krishna having sixteen thousand women?

From the posting you've put up. Yes, because you are so stupid

"Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Z1jNa.87937$Pc5.21556@fed1read01...
> Do you really believe that I would believe in the mythical character,
> Krishna having sixteen thousand women?

Like I said, because ALL your posts are full of rubbish you have laid your
own trap. You pretended to be something else but still you idiocy go
exposed. New agers are keen to believe any rubbish - and as part of the
gang you simply exposed you idiocy.
"Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
news:wzoNa.88265$Pc5.63138@fed1read01...
> No, no. See? You are stupid and gullible, because you are one of those
> individuals that falls for things without exploring things further.
> Intelligent people will know better.
>
> Anyone could clearly see that I was joking, because who on God's green
> earth has sixteen thousand wives? No one, not even the greatest king.
>

> ...He claims Bhagwan was a fraud and only pretended to be enlightened.

He was mainly a teacher of vipassana meditation, mindfulness meditation. He
was also a teacher of indulgence etc., many wrong things. He had a double
nature. He was enlightened, but he was also sick (body & mind). He allowed
his evil (revenge), that came out of his past where he faced so much
injustice, both before and after his enlightenment. That slowly got into
him, and for some reason his good nature couldn't handle it, and he became a
split personality. An enlightened man is not completely beyond psychology,
as he has his mind and feelings, just like everyone else.

Whatever he teaches about meditation is basically correct. Whatever he
teaches about indulgence and expressing evil etc., is basically wrong. When
he ignores the laws of karma by teaching that one gets free from evil etc.,
by expressing it, he is teaching the opposite of the truth, that is in
suppressing anything that is against the dharma, our good nature. He knew
the expression will increase those problems, their power, and he also knew
the suppression to be the cure, but brainwashed his people to think
suppression is bad - that wasn't difficult as a part of psychology has been
thinking the same, and the suppression subject is complicated, beyond
current level of psychological understanding, not to mention the
understanding of the average man. For all times man has naturally always
suppressed, controlled his lower nature, and that is that path to complete
purity, it's understood by man naturally, and that expression will be just
the opposite.

> ...He claims Bhagwan was a fraud and only pretended to be enlightened.

He was mainly a teacher of vipassana meditation, mindfulness meditation. He
was also a teacher of indulgence etc., many wrong things. He had a double
nature. He was enlightened, but he was also sick (body & mind). He allowed
his evil (revenge), that came out of his past where he faced so much
injustice, both before and after his enlightenment. That slowly got into
him, and for some reason his good nature couldn't handle it, and he became a
split personality. An enlightened man is not completely beyond psychology,
as he has his mind and feelings, just like everyone else.

Whatever he teaches about meditation is basically correct. Whatever he
teaches about indulgence and expressing evil etc., is basically wrong. When
he ignores the laws of karma by teaching that one gets free from evil etc.,
by expressing it, he is teaching the opposite of the truth, that is in
suppressing anything that is against the dharma, our good nature. He knew
the expression will increase those problems, their power, and he also knew
the suppression to be the cure, but brainwashed his people to think
suppression is bad - that wasn't difficult as a part of psychology has been
thinking the same, and the suppression subject is complicated, beyond
current level of psychological understanding, not to mention the
understanding of the average man. For all times man has naturally always
suppressed, controlled his lower nature, and that is that path to complete
purity, it's understood by man naturally, and that expression will be just
the opposite.

You are fool for responding to these emails. Suxed in!

"Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
news:AmINa.89191$Pc5.40212@fed1read01...
> Yes, yes, whatever, blame your lack of ability to discern from jokes and
> serious postings on me. I don't mind. I'll be your whipping boy, since
> you seem so fond of blaming others for things. Its okay, we understand.
>
> Science wrote:
> > Like I said, because ALL your posts are full of rubbish you have laid
your
> > own trap. You pretended to be something else but still you idiocy go
> > exposed. New agers are keen to believe any rubbish - and as part of the
> > gang you simply exposed you idiocy.
> > "Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:wzoNa.88265$Pc5.63138@fed1read01...
> >
> >>No, no. See? You are stupid and gullible, because you are one of those
> >>individuals that falls for things without exploring things further.
> >>Intelligent people will know better.
> >>
> >>Anyone could clearly see that I was joking, because who on God's green
> >>earth has sixteen thousand wives? No one, not even the greatest king.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>

You are fool for responding to these emails. Suxed in!

"Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
news:AmINa.89191$Pc5.40212@fed1read01...
> Yes, yes, whatever, blame your lack of ability to discern from jokes and
> serious postings on me. I don't mind. I'll be your whipping boy, since
> you seem so fond of blaming others for things. Its okay, we understand.
>
> Science wrote:
> > Like I said, because ALL your posts are full of rubbish you have laid
your
> > own trap. You pretended to be something else but still you idiocy go
> > exposed. New agers are keen to believe any rubbish - and as part of the
> > gang you simply exposed you idiocy.
> > "Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:wzoNa.88265$Pc5.63138@fed1read01...
> >
> >>No, no. See? You are stupid and gullible, because you are one of those
> >>individuals that falls for things without exploring things further.
> >>Intelligent people will know better.
> >>
> >>Anyone could clearly see that I was joking, because who on God's green
> >>earth has sixteen thousand wives? No one, not even the greatest king.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>

Attention Mr. Allen Crider. Mr. Hans Neukomm, the impostor from
news-server.bigpond.net.au, is impersonating you.

Allen Crider <spam@swnews.net> wrote in message news:<BwwRa.743$OM3.366@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> No not really
>
> Brother Brahman-Atmananda wrote:
>
> >Why did you choose to become a part of this thread then? If responding
> >to the post of a fool makes one a fool, then you are also a fool by
> >your own standards.
> >
> >"Fat Magic" <ken@park.net> wrote in message news:<XWPNa.460$pg6.10322@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> >> You are fool for responding to these emails. Suxed in!
> >>
> >> "Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:AmINa.89191$Pc5.40212@fed1read01...
> >> > Yes, yes, whatever, blame your lack of ability to discern from jokes and
> >> > serious postings on me. I don't mind. I'll be your whipping boy, since
> >> > you seem so fond of blaming others for things. Its okay, we understand.

Attention Mr. Allen Crider. Mr. Hans Neukomm, the impostor from
news-server.bigpond.net.au, is impersonating you.

Allen Crider <spam@swnews.net> wrote in message news:<BwwRa.743$OM3.366@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> No not really
>
> Brother Brahman-Atmananda wrote:
>
> >Why did you choose to become a part of this thread then? If responding
> >to the post of a fool makes one a fool, then you are also a fool by
> >your own standards.
> >
> >"Fat Magic" <ken@park.net> wrote in message news:<XWPNa.460$pg6.10322@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> >> You are fool for responding to these emails. Suxed in!
> >>
> >> "Swami Dâ Prem" <bayswamiji@cox.net> wrote in message
> >> news:AmINa.89191$Pc5.40212@fed1read01...
> >> > Yes, yes, whatever, blame your lack of ability to discern from jokes and
> >> > serious postings on me. I don't mind. I'll be your whipping boy, since
> >> > you seem so fond of blaming others for things. Its okay, we understand.